NOT KNOWN FACTUAL STATEMENTS ABOUT AR COMP LOAD DATA

Not known Factual Statements About ar comp load data

Not known Factual Statements About ar comp load data

Blog Article

To sum it up, just get started checking the cost of the powder to start with. Between H-one hundred ten and acquire 296 (that are the two the identical powder), the H-110 most enough time could be the less expensive powder. On 300mp, it hard to find it in the 8lb jug, and Except if you'll find it in a very 8lb jug, or your supplier will cut you a selling price on 8-1lb cans for the 8lb jug rate, then H-one hundred ten is normally the less expensive powder that you can discover instead.



The equilibrium is for powder. Because your crimp goes to the wad column/hull your powder just isn't cumbersome plenty of which makes it possible for the shot/wad column to established much too deep from the hull. Because you have severe constraints with component availability during the 410 gauge its in all probability essential to improve powder to be able to take care of the condition.

Accurate Powders is undoubtedly an American company that life up to its identify. Accurate Powder’s complete line of smokeless powders for handguns, shotguns, and rifles is lab-tested/engineered To maximise the precision and performance of any firearms.

Dano523 said: Only dilemma with not reaming the shot bushing to throw 226 of shot in a HS hull with .296" powder bushing, will be the shot will probably rattle from the shell (my version of a practice only load In case the shot rattles if you shake the round). Simply click to expand...

Does everyone have any even more info on the small print of cold weather conditions difficulties encountered with Alliant 410? Are .410 shotshell loads Protected if shot while in the bitter cold... as winters are for some of us? I for one particular, want to know whether it is the particular chemical composition of Alliant 410 or ignition complications which could induce a 'double pressure spike' in enough time force curve?

And Indeed, I've utilized all three powders, and could drop flats of these on stations in mixes, and you also would not be capable to explain to which shell had what powder, Because the speeds and patterns are so shut jointly for the 1350fps array, there isn't any viable distinction in performance of your shells.




I use this powder as it is actually a “ball” powder, not a “adhere”. I use it in my Dillon XL650. When the powder evaluate is set, Each and every toss is accurate within 0.one grains. It provides splendidly steady ammunition.

Alliant 410 smokeless shotshell powder is often a clean burning, remarkable overall performance shotshell flake powder which can be specially made for .410 subject and sport loading. . This highly successful, clean burning powder delivers decreased charge weights and gives prime general performance in almost any climate.

Accurate 1680 uses the best ballistic professionals plus the highest excellent components together to guarantee that every gun is best served with Accurate Powders.

That's why at 1200fps, the 410 with its prolonged and slender shot column will very hot spot center, whilst the enhanced velocity will help the center pellets to fill out the pattern, in lieu of very hot place centering isntead.

Alliant 410 - He stated it has not been promoted to be a magnum handgun powder for the reason that pressures climb as temperatures drop. He hinted that Lil'gun behaved that way as well but that Hodgdon had selected to release handgun data for it.

Accurate 1680 Powder is a popular preference among tiny caliber rifle and pistol shooters who need steady performance and accuracy. This smokeless powder is built to deliver high velocities and tight groups, making it a great choice for competitive shooting and varmint looking.




While I have never read experimented with it I concur with your thinking on the 4 ball load, sounds like the same issue as I Formerly described which has a 5 pellet load of OOO buck.

I'm able to ensure from to start with hand expertise the 13gr. this post load will work similar to a attraction with a load of 3 @ 0.395" balls; my loads were plastic shells but I see no purpose why it wouldn't perform with total size metallic shells.

Report this page